What the documents look like
For product questions in B2B marketplaces, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
A B2B selection question can mix supplier identity with product information. A proposed ordinary-text test may state that business-scope material and a quoted model are supplied, while use restrictions for that model remain unavailable. The workflow needs those statements and their separate origins. After form submission, inspect what the reading step receives. In particular, check whether a supplier name becomes a product model or a company’s business scope is incorrectly turned into a technical capability of the item.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Check | Proposed input for this page | Observed acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Separate identities | Business scope from company material; model from a quotation | Downstream input preserves both origins and meanings |
| Form handoff | Model wording and missing use restrictions | Submitted text matches the reading step’s input |
| Choice destinations | Obtain specifications or read only the quotation | Each choice follows its connected route |
| Retest after addition | New specifications and the original question | The answer cites new evidence and retains unknowns |
| External business | The actual stock or procurement service contract | Check authorization, response and business records separately |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
If procurement asks whether the model fits an intended use, identify the required product evidence before designing a human choice. Requesting manufacturer specifications and reading only the current quotation lead to different inputs. Test each connected destination and its received values; the quotation-only route cannot supply the specifications missing from the other route. A source owner’s choice to continue reading does not establish supplier qualification, product suitability or procurement admission. If company business scope becomes product certification in the selection answer, inspect the subjects of the company material and model guidance separately. Entity evidence does not establish item certification; remove that conclusion without the product source.
How to verify the setup
Trace acceptance from the original question through submitted text, downstream input and the final answer. Check that the supplied model description survives and that its missing use restrictions remain explicit. After receiving specifications, repeat the same question and inspect the changed sources. Stock lookup, procurement-request creation or an external write requires separate authorization and an actual business response. Completing this selection conversation does not establish that a transaction operation occurred.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Business Certification Documents, Inquiry and Quotation Sheet, Electronic Contract and Platform Settlement Statement |
| Candidate sources | B2B Platform, National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, Payment Transaction Records and Logistics Tracking |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |