What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Franchise fee settlement, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Separate plans, invoicing and receipt in shared franchise settlement progress, checking store and actual recipient visibility. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed store summary states that current reconciliation awaits review and invoicing text was received, excluding bank details, other-store collection and internal violation comments. Inspect actual recipient passages through the complete link, preserving store and period. Entry credentials establish no actual franchise identity; required validation depends on verified commercial capability. A plan describes arrangements and an invoice supports its contents. An open link supplies no receipt evidence or mutual settlement agreement merely because the sources were shared.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Franchise-settlement share | Progress source | Verification evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Public summary | Open reconciliation and received text | Store, period and passage |
| Restricted sources | Bank details, other stores and comments | Full answer and denial |
| Device follow-up | Store and period behind this receipt | Actual history and supplementation |
| Financial stages | Plans and invoices are not funds or balance | Funds and reconciliation confirmation |
| Business action | Sharing performs no funds or invoicing | Authority and actual records |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If this summary exposes other-store collection or internal violation comments, retain source identity and full answers. Shared finance administration authorizes no disclosure, including paraphrases.
- If a phone asks about receipt without the computer’s period and reconciliation question, inspect history and obtain them. Anonymous identity cannot automatically borrow a recent record.
- If a plan or invoice becomes received funds or balanced accounts, inspect actual funds and reconciliation confirmation separately. Entry validity supplies no payment result.
How to verify the setup
Ask about public progress, other-store sources and internal comments separately, recording responses, denials and versions. Distinguish obtained receipts omitted from input from unobtained funds evidence; renewal and longer conversation create no facts. Repeat object-free follow-ups across devices and inspect requests for store and period. Sharing collects nothing, invoices nothing and performs no reconciliation. Formal handling needs business authority and actual records. Keep unsupported stages unresolved instead of presenting a summary as the accounting outcome.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Franchise Fee Invoice, Deposit Ledger, Deduction Notice and Contract Payment Plan |
| Candidate sources | Financial System, Franchise Contract, Bank Statement and Store Violation Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |