What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Brand member operations, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Inspect public terms and the receiving environment in a membership-activity share without deriving identity or contact authority from labels or links. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed entry shares local activity wording and unresolved questions, excluding actual member data, other-store lists and internal label analysis. Read recipient passages through the complete link, preserve the version, then request restricted sources. Public terms do not make every link holder eligible for membership benefits, and entry credentials establish no brand-member identity. Labels explain classification rather than activity eligibility, contact consent or sent messages. Describe the actual terms’ coverage instead of supplying missing conditions through a familiar activity name.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Membership-activity share | Visible terms and gaps | Actual check |
|---|---|---|
| Public scope | Local terms and open questions | Version and received passages |
| Privacy restriction | Lists, other stores and internal analysis | Full answer and denial |
| Device follow-up | Activity behind participation question | Actual history and conditions |
| Permission distinction | Separate label, identity, contact and sending | Current evidence and record |
| Subsequent action | Sharing grants no benefit or message | Business eligibility and execution |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If public answers expose member lists or internal labels, retain full answers and source identity. Hiding names replaces no restriction, including indirect paraphrases.
- If a phone asks about participation without the computer’s activity terms, inspect history and obtain scope. Anonymous identity cannot automatically inherit context or establish eligibility.
- If a notification plan or label match becomes sent communication and consent, inspect this contact’s authority and actual sending record separately. Sharing executes nothing and obtains no consent.
How to verify the setup
Test public rules, other-store sources and internal analysis for reads and denials, retaining passages, conditions and versions. Distinguish obtained current terms omitted from input from unobtained eligibility evidence. Longer dialogue or validity supplies neither. Inspect required identity validation under verified commercial capability while business eligibility still needs its sources. Sharing changes no labels, grants no benefits and sends no messages. Keep unresolved conditions visible rather than treating an accessible link, ended conversation or draft notice as participation and operating results.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Member Tagging Sheet, Engagement Plan, Coupon Rules and Privacy Authorization Records |
| Candidate sources | CRM System, WeCom, POS Consumption Records and Mini Program Behavior Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |