What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Fruit-store procurement, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Check entry, source version and recipient for shared fruit-purchasing service questions. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A hypothetical shared fruit-purchasing exercise contains an arrival note: unloaded into a pending-inspection area, with damaged crates still to be checked. A buyer’s proposed supplier enquiry has no reply. Users should see the outstanding inspection in the shared entry; opening a link does not show that this note supplied the answer. Inspect source scope separately for an internal purchasing exercise and material intended for a supplier. The link recipient and business correspondent also have distinct roles. Unloading establishes location, without settling fruit condition or the supplier’s handling position.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Purchasing share check | Batch wording | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Arrival | Unloaded pending inspection | No acceptance inferred |
| Anomaly | Crates require checking | Separate fruit inspection |
| Entry | Complete link and store embed | Inspect cited version |
| Speaker | Buyer draft without reply | Sending and actual response |
| New device | Earlier history may be absent | Resupply the batch note |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If the store entry returns an older batch’s acceptance, retain the complete share link, actual citation and note version. Inspect whether the entry still targets older material.
- If the buyer’s proposed enquiry becomes supplier agreement, inspect authorship, sending evidence and actual reply. Opening a page creates no supplier position.
- If another device asks about this batch without the earlier note, inspect its actual conversation input. Supply the batch material again; anonymous history is not automatically inherited across devices.
How to verify the setup
Test both the generated complete link and the store’s embedded entry with the same pending-inspection question. Retain returned passages and sources, distinguishing unloading from acceptance. On a new device, supply explicit batch identity and the same note, comparing evidence-gap handling with and without history. Inspect actual entry and edition conditions if a request limit appears; it establishes no supplier refusal or business outcome. This text-access exercise sends no enquiry and treats no shared conversation as inspection or supplier confirmation.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Purchase Order, Acceptance Slip, Pesticide Residue Test Report and Loss Records |
| Candidate sources | Wholesale Market Trends, Supplier Quotation, Store Sales and Test Report |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |