What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Cross-border settlements, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Platform-settlement service reads first match the order to the statement period. A returned statement does not establish business receipt of funds. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A proposed inquiry asks why this order remains unsettled, but prior output retains only a previous-period statement title and fee material from another period. Inspect transaction identity and period under the actual external contract instead of using an old title as current conditions. A returned statement supports its recorded stage, not actual receipt. Fee material cannot supply this order’s settlement outcome. No rates, amounts or fee figures are transmitted in the example.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Settlement-service reading | Proposed scope problem | Actual check |
|---|---|---|
| Prior-period title | Not current order identity | Transaction and period |
| Fee material | Different period | Not settled-status evidence |
| Returned statement | Recorded stage | Not actual receipt |
| Request body | Real contract and request type | Inspect content, do not assume |
| Formal outcome | Payment and reconciliation separate | Reading is not a commitment |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Old period used for this order needs transaction-period and actual-request checks. Statement generation promoted to receipt needs real collection evidence. Fee material promoted to settled status requires transaction correspondence and period confirmation. These inspect scope, fund stage and source relationships independently of a nonempty return.
How to verify the setup
Retain source titles, transmitted conditions and actual responses. Add the order’s period and inspect changed return coverage. Empty results require authorization and read-condition checks before denying outstanding matters. Payments, reconciliation confirmation and accounting writes need separate authority and receipts. Where the real contract requires a body, inspect content under the applicable request type. Reading provides neither exchange instructions nor settlement commitments.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Platform Settlement Statement, Exchange Rate Sheet, Service Fee Invoice and Collection Reconciliation Sheet |
| Candidate sources | Platform Settlement Center, Bank Statement, Payment Institution Backend and ERP Orders |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |