What the documents look like
For after-sales questions in Chain-store closure accounts, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Order service after closure still needs the order’s goods and handling outcome. Closure approval and asset counts cannot replace customer-service evidence. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A proposed customer asks where this order’s goods are. Input contains closure approval and asset lists without order-receipt correspondence; refund handling is pending. Establish how the actual service identifies the order instead of treating store assets as customer goods. Approval records a decision and counting covers listed assets. Changed store status cannot close after-sales work, and returned closure material cannot establish refunded funds. Missing relationships remain explicit rather than guessed destinations.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Closure-service reading | Proposed source subject | Keep separate |
|---|---|---|
| Closure approval | Store decision | Not order-case closure |
| Asset list | Listed store assets | Not customer goods |
| Order relationship | Receipt mapping absent | Order-specific evidence |
| Refund task | Handling pending | Not returned funds |
| Empty query | Inspect access and scope | Not lost goods |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Closure promoted to case closure needs the actual service outcome. Assets substituted for customer goods need identity correspondence. Pending handling promoted to refund needs the current fund-execution record. These inspect decision coverage, item ownership and action stage without merging through a store name.
How to verify the setup
Retain actual transmitted input and response wording. Added order-item mapping changes the corresponding destination explanation only. Empty returns require authority, scope and completeness checks before alleging lost goods. Lease termination, asset handling, refunds and notices need separate authority and receipts. HTTP reading performs none of those actions and makes no liability or debt judgment from closure files. This order still needs its own handling evidence.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Store Closure Approval, Inventory Clearance Order, Lease Termination Agreement and Asset Inventory Sheet |
| Candidate sources | POS Inventory, Fixed Asset System, Lease Contract and Financial Accounts |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |