What the documents look like
For copy drafting in Store price and display checks, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Store-display rectification copy separates inspection images, notices and reinspection conclusions. A changed label does not establish conformity across the store. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
Proposed inspection wording says shelf labels await updating. A notice requests a check, but photographs still show the old display. Collect store identity, image origin and notice passages. A person may obtain updated material or reinspection findings. Supply no prices or standard values. A notice states an action required; an old image shows its capture-time scene. Neither establishes present rectification, and a label list does not establish replacement everywhere.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Rectification-copy drafting | Proposed source status | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Inspection wording | Labels await update | Pending action retained |
| Rectification notice | Check requested | Not completion evidence |
| Image origin | Old display | Updated material needed |
| Coverage | Local change is not whole store | Actual reinspection |
| Input destination | Material or outcome collection | Store identity retained |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
Notice promoted to completion needs actual reinspection. An old image promoted to current condition requires source timing and updated material. One changed label expanded to the whole store needs coverage evidence. These inspect action stage, image origin and conclusion scope independently of workflow output.
How to verify the setup
Inspect store subjects and evidence gaps received by both branches. Added photographs change only the display they show, not whole-store completion. Missing reinspection remains explicit. Field rectification, price maintenance and public release need separate authority and records. Continued execution establishes neither current store condition nor an inspection outcome and supplies no business-performance promise.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Store Inspection Photos, Price Tag List, Display Standards and Rectification Notice |
| Candidate sources | Supervisor System, POS Price List, Store Cameras and Headquarters Promotion Schedule |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |