What the documents look like
For document comparison in Marketplace promotions, this page examines FastGPT context limits. Preserve permission to submit creative separately from fee and activation terms without borrowing a prior event’s authorization. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the context limits step
A hypothetical event clause permits submission of creative for this occasion while fees and activation timing require a separate confirmation letter. A note records prepared material only. History includes an activation confirmation for a previous event, without a letter for this one. Input retaining only permission to submit may expand a limited permission into settled fees and execution timing. Inspect whether event identity, permitted action and the separate-letter prerequisite remain together in the actual request. Preparing creative establishes neither submission nor a running event. No real fee figure or payment arrangement is provided.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Event-clause context | Original scope | Inspection action |
|---|---|---|
| Limited permission | Submit creative for this event | Retain action and event identity. |
| Separate letter | Fees and timing unconfirmed | Inspect delivery of the prerequisite. |
| Historical letter | Previous event confirmed | Do not determine the current period from it. |
| Preparation | Material ready | Add no submission or execution event. |
| Current letter added | Matter and applicable period | Trace changed conclusions on the same questions. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Model context | Use the actual model’s accepted context scope. |
Reply length | The reply limit differs from the context window. |
Knowledge-reference limit | Knowledge citation limits are token-based. |
History-input check | Compare empty-history and populated-history inputs. |
Structured-output handoff | Validate parsing, then inspect support for field values. |
Three common errors
- If the separate confirmation disappears from input while the comparison declares settled fees and timing, compare the full clause with material actually delivered to locate the clipped prerequisite.
- If a follow-up borrows the previous event’s letter, hold current sources fixed across history conditions and inspect event, version and applicable period.
- If prepared creative becomes execution evidence in a table, inspect the recorded action and actual execution material. Parseable fields create no new event.
How to verify the setup
Ask what submission is permitted, where the fee basis is stated and which material confirms activation. Trace each answer to actual input. When a current letter arrives, inspect event, covered matter and period before repeating the questions. Later receipt does not establish later activation. Inspect citation-token budgets separately from reply limits and the actual model’s accepted context scope. Verify that necessary prerequisites arrived and were used. Longer answers or a responsive workflow alone do not establish that result.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Activity Registration Form, Promotional Price Approval Form, Inventory Lock Sheet and Activity Review Form |
| Candidate sources | Tmall Marketing Backend, JD Activity Backend, ERP Inventory and Historical Transaction Prices |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |