Marketplace promotions: document comparison with access controls

Review access controls for document comparison in Marketplace promotions. Check document scope, failure paths and source evidence through controlled tests.

What the documents look like

For document comparison in Marketplace promotions, this page examines FastGPT access controls. Inspect users of registration, approval and inventory resources separately, without deriving access from campaign classification or approval titles. The examples are hypothetical.

Constraints at the access controls step

A comparison exercise assigns registration review to operations, approval review to finance and stock review to sales planning. All concern one campaign but need different sources. Test resources individually with actual accounts, recording originals and operations. If a registration-only identity reads internal calculations, retain the response to investigate scope. Campaign labels organize material without granting all members access. A job title in an approval table configures no team role; map responsibilities to specific accounts and resources.

Configuration and implementation checks

Permission checkCampaign-comparison allocationActual evidence
Reading needsOperations registration, finance approval, planning stockAccount, resource and operation tests
Scope failureRegistration identity reads internal calculationRetain full response
Platform boundarySeparate sources for the same productNo grant merging from a shared name
External sourceCampaign backend and ERP interfaceSeparate authentication and internal grants
Content and executionPlanned lock, availability and approval differConfirm backend records and owner decision

Documented conditions

Documented item / implementation checkCondition
Team rolesInspect roles for the actual member identity.
Resource permissionsInspect reading, editing and management by resource.
Document classificationClassification and tags do not replace authorization.
External-system permissionsVerify external-interface authentication separately.
Per-account validationTest the same source with authorized and unauthorized accounts.

Three common errors

  • If registration, finance and stock responsibilities become configured roles, inspect actual account resources and operations. Activity labels and titles establish no grants automatically.
  • If a registration identity reads internal calculations or another platform’s stock, retain source identities and full response. Shared product names cannot merge platform permissions.
  • If ERP or campaign readability becomes internal rights or secured stock, inspect authentication, grants and events separately. Planned locking establishes neither availability nor commercial approval.

How to verify the setup

Ask operations, finance, planning and denied identities about the same campaign, recording sources read, operations allowed and denials. Paraphrased restricted approval text needs full-response inspection even with no displayed attachment. If access works as intended but another period is used, inspect input versions separately. Retain unresolved permission and content items. Actual registration, approval and inventory changes still require backend records and owner confirmation, rather than completion inferred from the comparison conversation.

Material contextScope
Document typesActivity Registration Form, Promotional Price Approval Form, Inventory Lock Sheet and Activity Review Form
Candidate sourcesTmall Marketing Backend, JD Activity Backend, ERP Inventory and Historical Transaction Prices
Technical baselineFastGPT v4.17.2