What the documents look like
For document comparison in Livestream sample inspections, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Live-sale sample tools compare terms, samples and batch evidence without generalizing quality claims. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
Suppose selection terms cover appearance display only, sample wording includes no functional test and production-batch material awaits the supplier. Limit the tool to comparing these passages, requiring item, sample identity and clause version. After connection to the calling module, inspect system parameters and plugin configuration separately. Missing necessary correspondence may prevent invocation. No actual test or quality finding is supplied.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Live-sale sample tool | Hypothetical material | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance display | Limited terms | No functional guarantee |
| Sample wording | No function test | Not batch conformity |
| Batch material | Still absent | No advertising permission |
| Required input | Item/sample/version | Actual invocation |
| Formal selection | Authorized procedure | Evidence and receipt |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Appearance terms reported as a functional guarantee need clause scope checked. Sample wording reported as accepted production goods needs batch and inspection evidence checked. Missing material followed by permission to advertise needs approval and support checked. These examine promise scope, sample extrapolation and usage authority independently of tool return.
How to verify the setup
Trace input, call parameters and response to sources. Keep the sample label beside missing functional evidence and leave batch material open. Inspect actual terminal output if calling stops. Added inspection material supports its relevant item alone. Formal selection acceptance, publicity approval and order operations require authorized procedures and receipts. The tool lists support and gaps without deciding safety or whole-batch conformity. Locate appearance terms separately from missing sample-test evidence, linking production records by batch so each publicity statement has identifiable support without substituting a sample name.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Sample Evaluation Form, Quality Inspection Report, Supplier Qualifications and Prohibited Sales List |
| Candidate sources | Supplier Information, Testing Agency Report, Platform Negative Catalog and Historical Return Rate |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |