What the documents look like
For document comparison in Cross-border resale returns, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Returned-goods comparison distinguishes appearance work, component replacement and resale evidence. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A proposed clause covers appearance work only, leaves component replacement to a separate agreement and lacks resale documentation. Describe the tool as comparing clauses with evidence, specifying required product identity, version and attachment scope. Check system-module parameters separately from plugin configuration, connect available tools and observe actual invocation. No inspection or completed sale is supplied in the material; tool output cannot create either fact.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Returns-clause tool | Paper content | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Relevant item | This item/version | Inspect invocation input |
| Appearance work | Limited scope | No functional-repair inference |
| Replacement | Separate agreement needed | Find agreement text |
| Resale | Evidence absent | No completed-sale inference |
| Business decision | Separate inspection/transaction | Tool lists evidence gaps |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Appearance work enlarged into functional repair needs clause scope checked. An absent appendix reported as agreed replacement needs agreement text checked. Handling terms reported as completed resale need event evidence checked. These examine scope, an evidence gap and the difference between terms and events.
How to verify the setup
Retain source excerpts, tool parameters and responses, checking whether each citation belongs to this item and version. Preserve missing-input status when required parameters are unavailable. Assess terminal output if calling stops. Inspection, transaction confirmation and sales operations require their business processes. This comparison identifies support and gaps without deciding product safety or granting sales authority.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Return Quality Inspection Sheet, Refurbishment Records, Scrap Order and Resale Listing List |
| Candidate sources | Overseas Warehouse WMS, TikTok Return Center, Amazon Return Report and Product Quality Inspection Photos |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |