What the documents look like
For staff training in Franchise store supervision, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Check identities of supervision photo examples, store replies and scoring exercises. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed store-supervision lesson has an example examining price-label placement only, a practice store reply saying a sign was moved left and an exercise asking whether it is easy to read. Guidance requires the current standard for actual acceptance. The learner declares left placement universal and the store accepted. No actual standard or result is supplied; the reply records movement only. Preserve the example’s limited dimension instead of deriving a general display rule from one reading exercise or treating movement as evidence of conformance and completed acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Training-source check | Teaching identity and evidence scope | Acceptance action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation dimension | Label placement | Do not infer correct wording. |
| Movement action | Sign moved left | Do not call it accepted. |
| General requirement | One example supplies no universal rule | Inspect standard and store type. |
| Practice identity | Simulated store reply | Do not make it real operation. |
| Readability outcome | No actual measurement | Retain evaluation conditions. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, left movement may become a universal store standard; inspect the current requirement and applicable store type rather than converting one position into a rule. Second, a practice reply may become actual acceptance; check material identity and the reported action, since movement establishes no passed inspection. Third, a placement example may prove all label wording correct; return to its stated scope and inspect actual label text. These concern standard applicability, event identity and observation dimension. One practice item cannot supply all three missing judgments through a broad citation to the example.
How to verify the setup
Ask which dimension the example observes, what the reply reports and what the exercise asks, tracing actual references. A store reply alone leaves standard and acceptance unresolved without proving either conformance or failure. Added proposed standards need purpose and store type labelled rather than posing as current company policy. Empty references require scope and transfer investigation. This page conducts no visit or scoring and reports no measured reading convenience. Actual acceptance needs the applicable material and responsible confirmation beyond the proposed classroom exercise and the learner’s interpretation.