What the documents look like
For staff training in Marketplace advertising, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Validate a training share with keyword and audience exercises without confusing actual campaigns and classroom definitions. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
A proposed training entry provides keyword-report fragments and audience descriptions limited to classroom definitions, excluding actual plans. Inspect source identity through the complete link, then request formal campaign segmentation to test denial. Retain exposed campaign passages to investigate resources. If a classroom definition becomes an official platform measure, separately inspect preservation of its limitation in input. A usable example does not validate both source isolation and source identity.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Training-entry check | Keyword and audience exercise | Actual inspection |
|---|---|---|
| Classroom definition | Proposed status retained for fields | No claim of official platform measures |
| Actual plan | Operational audience appendix excluded | Full response and denial scope |
| Across devices | Reference to the preference label | Provide missing definition and original |
| Performance boundary | Preference does not establish results | Obtain measures, period and definition |
| Subsequent action | Explanation changes no bid or grade | Inspect scoring and advertising execution separately |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If keyword exercises expose actual audiences or plans, retain segmentation and full response to inspect grants. Usable example fields establish no source isolation.
- If a device change loses the question and definition behind preference performance, inspect history and obtain the exercise. Anonymous records cannot substitute another audience.
- If a preference becomes campaign performance or an official measure, inspect period, definition and actual measurement evidence. Classroom descriptions supply no outcome, and validity creates no metric basis.
How to verify the setup
Test earlier exercises, revised definitions and actual audience sources, retaining reads, denials and unresolved items. Inspect expiry, access and usage responsibility by version. Required third-party identity needs separate commercial capability and return checks. Classroom explanations neither change bids, submit plans nor write grades. Inspect downstream scoring and advertising actions independently rather than inferring updated business or learning records from a fluent entry response or a completed learner conversation.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Advertising Plan, Keyword Report, Audience Package Description and Conversion Attribution Table |
| Candidate sources | Juliang Qianchuan, JD Kuaiche advertising, Alimama and Store Transaction Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |