What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Export tax rebate filings, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. A refund-declaration material report preserves actual export, purchase and collection relationships. Tool organization cannot create a handling result or tax conclusion. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A proposed declaration report remains unresolved. Export and purchase sources use different names, and collection wording lacks current correspondence. Limit a tool to organizing sources and gaps without tax calculations or eligibility judgments. Similar names do not establish one transaction, and a declaration form establishes neither submission nor confirmation. Inputs need periods, subjects and origins; missing relationships cannot be invented to complete the report.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Declaration-material report tool | Proposed gap | Relationship check |
|---|---|---|
| Export and purchase | Different names | Actual transaction mapping |
| Collection excerpt | Current link unresolved | Period and subject |
| Declaration report | Preparation under review | Not a handling result |
| Required input | Preserve origin explanation | No guessed relationships |
| Formal processing | Declaration and finance separate | Organization is not tax determination |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Forced purchase-export matching needs actual correspondence. Prior-period receipt applied here requires temporal relationships. Preparation promoted to outcome needs this event’s real reply. These inspect transaction identity, time coverage and process stage independently of a returned tool result.
How to verify the setup
Compare actual input and raw output. Added purchase-export mapping changes correspondence alone while collection and declaration keep their own gaps. Confirm available tools, connections and suitable required inputs without promising automatic follow-up. Formal declarations, finance and external submission need separate authority and receipts. Termination supplies no later AI summary, and organized reports establish neither a tax result nor approved eligibility.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Export Tax Exemption/Refund Declaration Form, Export Declaration Form, Purchase Invoice and Foreign Exchange Receipt Voucher |
| Candidate sources | Electronic Tax Bureau, Export Tax Refund Declaration System, Customs Electronic Information and Financial Accounts |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |