What the documents look like
Sample inspection for livestream selling happens before a broadcast. The question under review is whether a product can be sold and whether it suits live demonstration. The working papers are sample evaluation forms, quality inspection reports, supplier qualification records, and prohibited-item lists. Sources include supplier submissions, testing-agency reports, platform negative catalogs, and historical return rates. Typical roles are selection managers, supply-chain business development staff, and quality inspectors, with data refreshed weekly and per item.
When these papers feed operating reports and exception reviews, they exchange data with external systems through HTTP interfaces. Returned fields, statuses, and identifiers become part of the review evidence, so report definitions and interface values must correspond field by field.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
The HTTP module sends a request to a specified address, operating much like Postman or ApiFox. Params carry path request parameters and are common in GET requests. Body carries the request body and is common in POST and PUT requests. Headers carry request headers. All three data sections can reference variables through {{}}, and the URL can reference variables the same way. Variables come from global variables, system variables, and upstream node outputs.
System variables include appId, chatId, responseChatItemId, variables, cTime, and histories. The documentation states that chatId and responseChatItemId do not exist in test mode, so a missing value during debugging is an environment difference and not a business fault. Return values are extracted with JSON path syntax. When the output type is string, the value for the corresponding key is converted into a json string.
The chat interface uses APIKey authentication. When calling chat/completions, passing body.appId in the request body is recommended, and Authorization: Bearer <apiKey>-<appId> is also supported. The appId priority order is body.appId, then <apiKey>-<appId>, then the appId associated with the apikey. Passed fields such as model and temperature have no effect because the orchestration decides them. With detail=true, intermediate values are stored in responseData, and Token values can be computed manually from the tokens field.
Hypothetical drill sample: a sample evaluation form states, "Supplier A, sample number S-001, submission date 3 March 2025, testing-agency report number R-2025-0303, conclusion meets broadcast requirements." A draft handover sentence reads, "R-2025-0303 is confirmed, S-001 can go live." The draft binds the report number directly to a broadcast conclusion, while the source text does not state the report validity period or the authorization signature status. The claim is unsupported and the evidence gap must remain open.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Value or check content | Basis and explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Request address and method | Select according to the external interface documentation; the address can reference variables | The HTTP module documentation states the URL can reference variables through {{}} |
| Params and Headers | Check path parameters and request headers separately; inject credentials securely | The documentation states both are used much like Postman |
| Body | Used only under the corresponding request type; check the JSON structure against the contract | The documentation states the body takes effect only under specific request types |
| Variable references | Check global variables, system variables, and upstream node outputs item by item | The documentation lists these three variable sources |
| Return value extraction | Configure the key with JSON path syntax and select the output type | The documentation states a string output type converts the value into a json string |
| Debug identity fields | chatId and responseChatItemId do not exist in test mode | The documentation states this difference; it is not a business fault |
Hypothetical trial starting point for this page: set the return value key to data.reportStatus with the output type set to string, for comparison against the report conclusion field in the sample evaluation form. This starting point is chosen because the interface response structure must first be confirmed, then aligned with the paper record field.
Three common errors
- Reporting chatId and responseChatItemId as an interface fault when they are absent in test mode. Input: a test-mode request. Comparison: the documentation statements about these two fields. Observable result: the values cannot be retrieved in test mode, which is an environment difference.
- Treating the report number and broadcast conclusion in the draft sentence as an effective authorization. Input: the draft sentence above. Comparison: the source text of the sample evaluation form. Observable result: the source does not state the validity period or signature status, so the claim is unsupported.
- Treating a similarity score returned by the interface as a permission or entity filter. Input: a response containing a score field. Comparison: the permission configuration. Observable result: similarity does not carry permission judgment, and a separate system implementation is required.
How to verify the setup
- Check the sample evaluation form source text against the draft sentence. Input: the two source sentences and the draft sentence. Comparison: whether the report number and the broadcast conclusion share the same subject, the same period, and the same field. If those conditions hold, the draft sentence can be retained; otherwise mark it as pending verification.
- Check the debug identity fields with a test-mode request. Input: a test request without chatId. Comparison: the documentation statements. Observable result: the field does not exist in test mode, and the check passes when the rest of the response is normal.
- Check the field path with the return value extraction configuration. Input: the interface response and the configured key. Comparison: JSON path syntax. Observable result: the check passes when the extracted value matches the corresponding field in the response. If the path does not match, record the actual observation and do not infer a specific error cause.