What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Chain-store site selection, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Site-review requests preserve interest, candidate locations and actual opening events. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
Suppose a candidate-site list records inspection interest only, a leasing email awaits confirmation of conditions and historical opening photographs concern another address. Pass site and matter identity under the real interface contract, checking address, method and variables with safely configured credentials. Inspect query authentication separately from signing authority. Readable material establishes no headquarters approval to open. No area, rent or business forecast is invented.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Site-review HTTP | Hypothetical material | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Candidate interest | Not signed | Actual contract |
| Lease conditions | Confirmation pending | Original qualification |
| Opening image | Another address | Event subject |
| Site variables | Abbreviation mapping needed | Actual passed input |
| Project handling | Authorized procedure | Approval and receipt |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Candidate interest reported as signed needs an actual contract checked. Pending conditions reported as mutual acceptance need email wording checked. Another address photograph reported as current operation needs address and event checked. These concern stage, opinion state and evidence subject independently of response success.
How to verify the setup
Retain redacted requests, raw responses and source locations. Address variants need actual correspondence rather than guesses from abbreviations. Mark image content unreviewed when only filenames return. An added contract updates signing assessment alone while operation still needs separate evidence. Signing, opening approval and project writes require authorized procedures and interfaces. HTTP reading supports review of existing material without creating those business outcomes. Attach verified address correspondence to site abbreviations, linking lease conditions separately from opening images so review can name the missing contract, acceptance or operating evidence.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Site Selection Evaluation Form, Letter of Intent for Lease, Renovation Budget and Opening Schedule |
| Candidate sources | Commercial District Foot Traffic, Map POI, POS Historical Store Types and Landlord Information |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |