What this category's data looks like
This page addresses business basis query for primary and secondary school enrollment organizations, involving three types of materials: enrollment plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. Enrollment plans contain fields for enrollment scope, time nodes, and admission rules; application material checklists contain fields for material name, number of copies, submission date, and receipt signature; admission lists contain fields for student name, admission batch, publicity date, and review signature. Material sources are education authority releases, school archives, and enrollment system exports; the update cadence is rolling by academic year or batch; the current version is identified by publication date and signed receipt. When the three types of materials enter hybrid retrieval and reranking, enrollment plans provide rule-based basis, application material checklists provide material-based basis, and admission lists provide result-based basis; each participates in retrieval and reranking as a candidate source, jointly supporting basis entries that can be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
The reranking model in the retrieval service only outputs the sorted candidates and rerank scores; basis entries that can be traced back to the original text must be handled next by citation trimming and answer generation. Hybrid retrieval runs both the vector and full-text paths and merges the results; after merging, the scope is large and similarity filtering cannot be applied directly, so the reranking model is usually then used to sort and filter by rerank score.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Fields include enrollment scope, time nodes, and admission rules; dates and signatures are complete, and the version is current | Check the vector and full-text path switches in the search parameters, confirm that searchMode covers both paths, and see whether candidates come from both paths at the same time |
| Application material checklist | Fields include material name, number of copies, submission date, and receipt signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials match up | Compare the ranking and scores before and after reranking, check that usingReRank is bound and used for sorting and filtering, and record the number of candidates and the scores |
| Admission list | Fields include student name, admission batch, publicity date, and review signature; when the version is not synchronized or a signature is missing, mark it as pending verification | After filtering by rerank score, check whether the top few entries trace back to the original text, record the number of candidates and the scores, and confirm that limit and similarity are not mixed up |
| Reranking model | Bound and used for sorting and filtering, outputting the sorted candidates and rerank scores | Compare the order and scores of the top three before and after reranking, check whether score filtering takes effect, and record the number of candidates |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the enrollment plan and admission list do not match. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and receipt verification.
- Symptom: the version of the application material checklist is not synchronized, and the old and new versions both enter the candidates. Cause: the update cadence is not locked by batch, and the version identifier is not refreshed with the publication date.
- Symptom: there are many candidates but the top few are irrelevant, and the results are clearly biased toward keyword hits. Cause: after merging, the scope is large, rerank score filtering is not used, and similarity filtering appears to be ineffective.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: compare the order and scores of the top three before and after enabling reranking, check that usingReRank is bound, record the number of candidates and the scores, and confirm that searchMode covers both the vector and full-text paths.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives traceable sources, and check that the basis comes from this school's materials, that the version is current, and that the entries match the original text.
- Check the vector and full-text path switches in the search parameters, confirm that candidates come from both paths at the same time, and record the number of candidates and the scores.
- Compare the ranking and scores before and after reranking, check whether score filtering takes effect, and confirm that
limitandsimilarityare not mixed up.