What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the business basis query for student disciplinary action and appeal handling; the materials include disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal statements. Disciplinary fact materials are used to fix the course of conduct and the evidence list, disciplinary decision documents are used to confirm the applicable clauses and effective date, and appeal statements are used to raise objections and requests. The three types of materials are updated by semester or event milestone, and the fields include the party's name, student ID, date of conduct, clause number, signature, and receipt. When the materials enter this feature, the disciplinary fact materials provide the factual anchor, the disciplinary decision documents provide the basis anchor, and the appeal statements provide the dispute anchor; together the three support basis entries that can be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the application settings (reply limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by the model; entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. The reply limit and context length do not determine access authorization, nor do they generate a finished business product.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | The party's name, date of conduct, number of evidence items, and signature field must be consistent with the corresponding records in the disciplinary decision document, and the clause number can be traced back to the original text | Compare the name, date, and quantity in the two materials item by item, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete |
| Disciplinary decision document | The clause number of the current version must match the basis entries cited in the appeal statement, and the effective date and delivery receipt must not be missing | Check the version number and effective date, and verify whether the citation in the appeal statement points to the same number |
| Appeal statement | The appeal request and the clause number of the disciplinary decision document and the date of the disciplinary fact materials must form a traceable chain | Extract the basis entries in the appeal statement and trace back to the original paragraphs and signature field |
| Reply limit | Matches the answer length required by the page; maxResponse controls the length of a single answer, quoteMaxToken is the budget for quoted content, and maxContext is the context range | Check the switch and slider positions in the application settings, and record the number of quoted entries and the tokens of the quoted text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the disciplinary fact materials and the disciplinary decision document. Cause: No cross-material comparison was performed during entry, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The clause number cited in the appeal statement cannot be found in the current version of the disciplinary decision document. Cause: After the disciplinary decision document was updated, it was not synchronized to the appeal handling step.
- Symptom: The disciplinary decision document lacks a signature or the appeal statement lacks a receipt. Cause: The delivery and acknowledgment steps were not closed-loop, and the material archiving is incomplete.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the values of maxResponse and quoteMaxToken match the page requirements.
Business test: Ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and record the number of quoted entries and the tokens of the quoted text.
- Check the reply limit switch and slider position in the application settings, and compare the usage changes between two runs.
- Extract one disciplinary decision document and the corresponding appeal statement, and compare the name, date, clause number, and signature receipt item by item.