What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the question acceptance scenario in graduate training process management. The materials come from three types of process documents: training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. The update cadence changes as training stages advance, and the field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts. When a training plan enters this feature, it assumes the role of verifying the training direction and course credit fields; the proposal report assumes the role of verifying the topic title, proposal date, and supervisor signature fields; the mid-term assessment form assumes the role of verifying the assessment conclusion, assessment date, and assessment panel signature fields. The three types of materials serve as cross-references for one another in question acceptance. If the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across two materials, or if the version is not synchronized or the signature receipt is missing, a missing item is formed, and a follow-up question must be asked before answering.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call it, and the node executes it), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The acceptance record and the completed follow-up questions are then handled by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter description, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Whether the name, quantity, date, and signature fields are consistent with the proposal report | Open the tool node description field and parameter configuration, verify whether the four values of name, quantity, date, and signature receipt come from the original material text, and run a trial with a question missing a required parameter to see whether it asks a follow-up question first |
| Proposal report | Whether the topic title, proposal date, and supervisor signature match the mid-term assessment form | Open the parameter configuration one by one, verify the two items of description and whether required, and check whether the input parameters of functionCall and toolChoice in the call record are taken from the material, avoiding fabricated values |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether the assessment conclusion, assessment date, and assessment panel signature are complete and the version is synchronized | Verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool, and run a trial with a question missing a signature or receipt to see whether it asks a follow-up question first |
| Acceptance record and completed follow-up questions | Whether missing items are identified and followed up on, and whether the answer has a material basis | Check the input parameters and return in the call record, confirm that the follow-up items correspond to fields that actually exist in the material, and then forward to the handler |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the training plan and the proposal report. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, no field-level comparison is performed, and the missing item is not identified.
- Symptom: The version of the mid-term assessment form is not synchronized, and the old version's signature or receipt is missing. Cause: After the material is updated, it is not re-verified, and the tool calling node still takes values according to the old version's parameters.
- Symptom: The model does not call the tool and directly gives an answer. Cause: The tool description or parameter description does not state the purpose and values, there are required parameters, and the context has no suitable value.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; check the behavior of toolChoice and functionCall in the call record to avoid values that do not exist in the business material appearing in the returned result.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Open the tool node description field, check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, and open the parameter configuration one by one to verify the two items of description and whether required.
- Verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, and run a trial with a question missing that field to confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool and has not fabricated parameter values.