What this category's data looks like
Student status changes and graduation qualification review material drafting and responsibility handover involve three types of materials: leave-of-absence/resumption-of-study applications, major transfer applications, and graduation review checklists. The sources are the student status system and academic affairs approval records, and the update cadence advances with application batches and review nodes. Field characteristics include student identifiers, change types, effective dates, course and credit records, signature fields, and receipt fields. When the materials enter the model access and configuration function, the leave-of-absence/resumption-of-study application plays the role of confirming the reason for the change and the effective time, the major transfer application plays the role of verifying course substitutions and alignment with the curriculum plan, and the graduation review checklist plays the role of determining the credit summary and graduation conclusion. After drafting, the three types of materials enter the handover stage and are signed for by the next stage; they can be issued only when the fields are complete, the responsible person is clear, and the version and date are consistent.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Issuable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexed, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Leave-of-absence/resumption-of-study application | Fields must include student identifier, change type, effective date, and signature field, and must be consistent with the same record name and date in the major transfer application | Check the application fields and signature field, compare the date and name of the same record in the two materials, and check whether maxContext and maxTokens meet the needs of drafting long materials |
| Major transfer application | Fields must include original major, target major, course substitution list, and responsible person's signature, and the number of courses must match the graduation review checklist | Check the number and names of courses in the course substitution list, compare them item by item with the graduation review checklist, and confirm that the version and date are synchronized |
| Graduation review checklist | Fields must include credit summary, graduation conclusion, reviewer, and receipt, and the version and date must be consistent with the leave-of-absence/resumption-of-study application and the major transfer application | Check the credit summary and graduation conclusion, check whether the receipt and signature are complete, and confirm the binding relationship of quoteMaxToken and toolChoice in the retrieval stage |
| Model binding relationships | The five model categories—language, indexed, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are bound to corresponding stages such as dialogue and retrieval | Check the type labels in the model configuration, and verify the model identifiers against the model names returned by the channel |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and date of the same student do not match between the leave-of-absence/resumption-of-study application and the major transfer application. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, without comparing fields for the same record and synchronizing versions.
- Symptom: The graduation review checklist is missing the reviewer's signature or receipt. Cause: The handover stage did not sign for receipt according to the responsible person, and missing items were not stopped before entering the next stage.
- Symptom: After changing models, the answer style changes abruptly, and retrieval reports errors related to the indexed model. Cause: The model type and stage binding are inconsistent, or channel key authentication fails.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check that the model identifiers in the responses match the names listed in the document, and confirm the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken in the channel responses; the number of citations is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget. The two are not compared for equality; when citation limits are involved, check the tokens of the citation text, and record the array count separately.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are stopped
- In the model configuration, check the type labels of the five model categories—language, indexed, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—and confirm that they correspond to the stages to be used
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and verify the model identifiers against the model names returned by the channel