What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on university employment contract signing and graduation destination statistics. The materials include employment agreements, graduation destination registration forms, and employer certificates. The employment agreement is signed by three parties: the student, the university, and the employer. Its fields include employer name, position, reporting date, and signatures and seals. The graduation destination registration form is filled out by the student and reviewed by the department. Its fields include destination type, employer location, and file transfer. The employer certificate is issued by the employer. Its fields include hiring intention, position name, and start date. The three types of materials have different sources and different update rhythms: agreements are generated immediately upon signing, registration forms are summarized by batch, and certificates are returned according to employer receipts. When entering the drafting and handover function, the agreement serves as the main record anchor, the registration form serves as the basis for destination classification, and the certificate serves as external supporting evidence. Complete fields, clear responsible parties, and consistent versions and dates are the baseline for judgment. Missing items must be intercepted before handover.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (reply limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Material drafts and handover records that can be issued" are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Employment agreement | Employer name, position, reporting date, and three-party signatures and seals are complete, and are consistent with the corresponding fields in the registration form | Compare the agreement and registration form field by field, check the signature and seal positions; verify whether maxResponse and maxContext match the needs of long drafts |
| Graduation destination registration form | Destination type, employer location, and file transfer information are complete, and the date is consistent with the reporting date in the agreement | Spot-check registration forms and agreement dates and employer names by batch; record the number of quoted text items and separately verify the quoteMaxToken budget |
| Employer certificate | Hiring intention, position name, and start date are consistent with the agreement, and there is an employer receipt or signature/seal | Check whether the certificate receipt has been returned, compare the position and start date; confirm that long answers end completely under the maxResponse setting |
| Handover record | Responsible parties are clear, versions and dates are consistent, and missing items are intercepted with correction requirements noted | Run through a handover process once, verify the recipient, version number, and date; check whether missing signatures or receipts trigger interception |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The employer name and number of positions for the same student do not match between the agreement and the registration form. Cause: The two materials are entered in different stages, and field-level comparison is not performed before handover.
- Phenomenon: The agreement has been updated to a new version, but the registration form still uses the old date and destination type. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version number and date were not checked during handover.
- Phenomenon: The employer certificate lacks a receipt or signature, but the draft is still issued. Cause: The handover check does not cover signature and receipt items, and the missing-item interception rules are incomplete.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; at the same time, verify the maxResponse and maxContext settings to confirm that long drafts are not truncated.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the application settings, verify the reply limit switch and slider position, and confirm that they match the answer length required by the page.
- Compare usage from two runs, check the change in single-run usage after adjusting the limit, and record the number of quoted text items and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget.