What this category's data looks like
For off-campus training compliance filing and penalty response, the material sources are the school operating license, course filing materials, fee disclosure, and handover records, and the update cadence rolls with filing batches and penalty rectification milestones. When materials enter this feature, the model channel configuration is only responsible for binding the five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—to the corresponding stages; the materials themselves are still verified against fields, dates, and signatures. For the same record, the name, quantity, and date in the license and course filing must be consistent; the fee disclosure and handover records must be version-synchronized, with complete signatures and receipts. In the dialogue stage, the language model is used to read the material draft; in the retrieval stage, the indexing model and reranking model are used to locate clauses; the speech stage only performs transcription and announcement, and does not change the attribution of responsibility for the materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or humans. The channel key only affects whether the call can succeed; it does not determine whether personnel can read the knowledge base materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School operating license | The institution name, address, and valid dates are consistent item by item with those in the course filing materials, and the signature field and receipt are complete | Check the name and dates word by word against the two materials, inspect the signature and receipt; in the channel configuration, confirm the language model binding relationship and model identifier |
| Course filing materials | The name, number of class hours, and course start date of the same course in the fee disclosure match, and the version number and update date are synchronized | Extract the records of the same-named course from the three materials for cross-comparison, and check the version and date; during retrieval, confirm that the indexing model and reranking model are bound |
| Fee disclosure | The fee items, refund rules, and disclosure date are consistent with those in the handover records, and the responsible person and recipient are clear | Compare the disclosure text with the handover record fields, and check whether missing items are blocked; in the dialogue, confirm that the values of maxContext and maxTokens do not truncate material fields |
| Handover records | The handing-over parties, handover date, material list, and receipt number are complete, and the version is consistent with the previous stage | Draft one according to the template and complete the handover, and check whether missing signatures or receipts are intercepted; during retrieval, check the reference text length corresponding to quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, number of class hours, and course start date of the same course in the filing materials and fee disclosure do not match. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and entered handover without cross-comparison.
- Symptom: The school operating license has been reissued in a new version, but the course filing materials still reference the old version number and old date. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the update cadence did not roll with the filing batches.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, but the next stage still signs off. Cause: The template did not make signatures and receipts required, so missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check that the model identifier in the response matches the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken do not truncate material fields.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels and binding stages of the five types of models: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition.
- Against the channel configuration and key source, verify that the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation, and record the number of array entries and the tokens of the reference text.