What this category's data looks like
In the scenario of establishment and annual reporting of Chinese-Foreign cooperative education institutions, the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association are the three core materials. Their sources are the school-running preparatory group and legal department of both cooperating parties, and their update cadence advances according to preparatory milestones and the annual reporting cycle. The establishment application focuses on institution name, educational level, cooperating parties, funding, and premises; the cooperation agreement focuses on the rights and obligations of both parties, term, dispute resolution, and signature page; the articles of association focus on governance structure, decision-making procedures, and seal receipt. When these three types of materials enter this feature, each assumes the role of field source, responsibility anchor, and version baseline: the application provides subject and quantitative fields, the cooperation agreement provides term and signature stipulations, and the articles of association provide the basis for internal approval and handover. Material drafting and responsibility handover require that the same record has consistent names, quantities, and dates across the three materials, with synchronized versions and dates, and complete signatures and receipts, before it can be handed to the next stage for sign-off.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints to reference. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Institution name, cooperating parties, educational level, funding, and premises fields are complete and consistent with the corresponding records in the cooperation agreement and articles of association | Check the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check whether the second turn can carry forward the references from the first turn; compare names, quantities, and dates field by field against the cooperation agreement and articles of association, and check whether the records in messages and variables are consistent |
| Cooperation agreement | The rights and obligations of both parties, term, dispute resolution, and signature page are complete, and the date and version are synchronized with the establishment application and articles of association | Retrieve the conversation history corresponding to chatId, and check whether the agreement term and the articles of association approval date are consistent; check whether signatures and receipts are missing, and whether the version number is synchronized with the other two materials |
| Articles of association | Governance structure, decision-making procedures, seal, and receipt fields are complete, and the names and dates match those in the establishment application and cooperation agreement | Check in the application settings whether the memory turn count matches the prior context range required by the question; run a trial with two consecutive question turns to confirm that the second turn carries forward the references from the first turn; compare the names, quantities, and dates of the articles of association with the other two materials |
| Handover record | Responsible persons are clear, versions and dates are consistent, signatures and receipts are complete, and missing items are blocked | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and check whether missing items are blocked; compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turn count |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same institution name is written differently in the establishment application and the cooperation agreement, and the quantities and dates also do not match. Cause: The field sources are maintained separately, without cross-material comparison and unified backfilling.
- Symptom: The articles of association have been updated to a new version, but the establishment application and cooperation agreement still cite the old version date. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version number and effective date were not checked during handover.
- Symptom: The cooperation agreement signature page lacks a signature or receipt, but the handover record is still advanced. Cause: The missing-item blocking rules do not cover the signature and receipt fields, and the responsible person did not confirm item by item.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and confirm that the memory turn count value matches the prior context range required by the question.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and confirm that the second turn carries forward the references from the first turn and that the opening message is not treated as prior context.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turn count; compare the names, quantities, dates, and versions of the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association field by field, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete.