What this category's data looks like
The materials on this page come from the scenario of student status establishment and changes in primary and secondary schools, and include three types: student status archives, transfer applications, and suspension/resumption materials. Student status archives provide students' basic fields and student status numbers; transfer applications record transfer-in and transfer-out dates and the opinions of both schools; suspension/resumption materials record the start and end of suspension and the resumption receipt. The three types of materials are updated weekly, and their fields include name, student status number, change type, date, signature, and receipt. After entering the knowledge base retrieval service, each serves as a source of candidate segments, and after pattern, merging, reranking, filtering, and upper-limit trimming, the referenced content is returned for subsequent nodes or manual generation of progress tables and statistical scope explanations.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), which outputs candidate segments and similarity scores (after pattern, merging, reranking, filtering, and upper-limit trimming). The "progress table and statistical scope explanation" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student status archives | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record match across the two materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare the number of candidates and scores, and check the archive fields and signatures |
| Transfer applications | Whether the dates, school names, and change types in the transfer application and student status archive are consistent, and whether the versions are synchronized | Turn usingReRank on or off, compare the ranking of the top few results, and check the dates and names in the transfer application and archive |
| Suspension/resumption materials | Whether the start and end dates of suspension are consistent with the resumption receipt, and whether missing signatures or receipts are clearly stated | Adjust the similarity threshold, record the number of candidates and scores, and check the dates and receipts in the suspension/resumption materials |
| Progress table and statistical scope explanation | Whether the recorded count matches the statistical count, whether the scope is written in the header, and whether exceptions are clearly stated | Use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, and record the number of referenced items and referenced text tokens |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same record do not match between the student status archive and the transfer application. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and their update rhythms differ.
- Phenomenon: Suspension/resumption materials lack signatures or receipts, and are included in the total during statistics. Cause: The signature was not checked during material collection, and exceptions were not stated in the scope.
- Phenomenon: There are many candidates, but the ones ranked at the front are all irrelevant, and the answer lacks key paragraphs. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, and reranking was not enabled.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then turn reranking on and off to observe the ranking of the top few results; switch searchMode and similarity, record the number of candidates and scores, and compare before and after toggling usingReRank.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, record the number of referenced items and referenced text tokens; for the reference upper limit, check only referenced text tokens, and record the array item count separately.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, compare the number of candidates and scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and check material fields and dates. - Turn
usingReRankon or off, compare the ranking of the top few results, and check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record match across the two materials.