What this category's data looks like
The materials for progress records and statistical verification of regular higher education institution admissions enrollment and filing come from three types of business documents: admissions plans, filing rules, and enrollment rosters. They are updated by batch and round, and the fields include institution code, major group, planned number, filing number, enrollment number, date, and signature column. Admissions plans provide the planned base and batch attribution; filing rules give the ratio, order, and exception clauses; enrollment rosters carry person-by-person records and receipts. When these three types of materials enter the progress table and statistical scope description, they each assume the roles of base, rules, and details: the quantities, dates, and signatures of the plans and rosters must match, and the rules determine how exceptions are included in the totals.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the connection configuration of the deployment environment (server side), not by the capability of a model node, and it outputs whether the connection is available (service startup result and connection logs). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by the deployment handover and subsequent business processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields include institution code, major group, planned number, batch, and date; the signature column is complete | In the deployment environment, check whether the planned number is consistent with the roster total, and check whether the date and signature are complete |
| Filing rules | The rule clauses specify the ratio, order, and exceptions, and the version is synchronized with the current batch | Compare the two materials to check the name and quantity of the same record, and confirm that the version is not lagging behind |
| Enrollment roster | Person-by-person records include filing number, enrollment number, date, and receipt signature | Use one week of records to check the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated |
| Main business database connection variable | Points to the main business database actually in use and can be connected | In the deployment environment, check that the variable value is consistent with the database address, and connect once item by item to the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the plan and the roster. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and the verification scope was not unified by batch.
- Symptom: The filing rule version is not synchronized, and the old ratio is still used. Cause: After the rules were updated, they were not checked together with the current batch materials.
- Symptom: The roster lacks a signature or receipt, and the total cannot be confirmed. Cause: When the records and statistical figures do not match, no traceback was made to the signature column and date column.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: connect once item by item to the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database, check the connection results in the startup logs, and check that the values of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL are consistent with the database addresses.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, and confirm that the number of records matches the statistical figures and that the scope is written in the header.
- In the deployment environment, check the values of the main business database and log database connection variables, and confirm that the log database is configured separately or reuses the main database according to the instructions.
- Use the client to connect once to the cache instance and check the return, and check the selected vector database and address against the deployment instructions.