What this category's data looks like
During the admissions season, college admissions physical examination organization must handle three types of materials: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. The sources are the school hospital and the registration points of each middle school, and the update cadence advances by day and is summarized by week. Physical examination forms record the candidate's basic items and the chief examiner's conclusion; re-examination applications record the review items and conclusion changes; restricted-major notifications record the notification time and the candidate's acknowledgment of receipt. When these three types of materials enter the progress record and statistical reconciliation function, each plays a different role: the physical examination form is the main basis for the record count, the re-examination application is the exception basis, and the restricted-major notification is the verification basis for signatures and receipts. The field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. For the same candidate, the name, number of items, physical examination date, and signature status in the three materials need to be aligned item by item in order to form a progress table and statistical basis statement that can enter a weekly or monthly report.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, which outputs the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "progress table and statistical basis statement" is parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreement to complete the rest. The HTTP module sends a request to the target address. Variables can be used as placeholders in all three places: path parameters, request body, and request headers. The variables come from global variables, system variables, or the output of preceding nodes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | The record count matches the statistical count, and the basis is written in the header; fields, dates, and signatures are complete | Check that the request body fields are consistent with the physical examination form basis, use variables to trace the source of each placeholder, and compare the returned fields of one sample |
| Re-examination application | The name, quantity, and date of the re-examination exception match the main physical examination form and are not mixed into the main basis | Check the source of the request header Authorization value, compare the return using one re-examination sample, and confirm that the exception is recorded separately |
| Restricted-major notification | The notification time and the candidate's acknowledgment status can be verified, and missing signatures or receipts can be located to specific records | Check that the path parameter placeholders can be resolved into actual values, and view the rendered complete address and responseData fields in the request preview |
| Statistical basis statement | The basis is written in the header, the record count matches the statistical count, and exceptions are clearly stated | Use one week of records to check the totals, compare the header basis and exception statement item by item, and confirm there are no omissions |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same candidate do not match across two materials. Cause: The physical examination form and the re-examination application are entered separately, and the fields are not aligned according to the same basis.
- Symptom: The restricted-major notification is missing a signature or receipt, but the progress table still counts it as completed. Cause: The signature status is not returned, and the statistical basis does not list missing receipts as an exception.
- Symptom: The request returns 401 or the external system receives empty fields. Cause: The authentication information is not passed in according to the external system's requirements, or the placeholder variables are not resolved into actual values.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample, and confirm that the values of variables, Authorization, and responseData are traceable.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the basis and exceptions are clearly stated, and confirm that the record count matches the statistical count.
- In the variable panel, check the source of each placeholder and confirm that the variables in all three places—path parameters, request body, and request headers—can be traced to a specific origin.
- Use one sample request to compare the return, check the request header names and value sources, and confirm that the fields received by the external system are consistent with the agreement.