What this category's data looks like
In the progress recording and statistical verification stage of university admissions physical examination organization, the main materials include three types: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. Physical examination forms are issued by the physical examination institution or the university hospital, and contain name, candidate number, physical examination date, chief examiner's conclusion, and signature; re-examination applications are submitted by the candidate or the middle school, and contain re-examination items, application date, original conclusion, and acceptance receipt; restricted-major notifications are issued by the admissions department, and contain the restricted major name, notification date, and candidate acknowledgment. Materials are summarized weekly and updated on a rolling basis as admissions batches advance; the field characteristic is that the same candidate appears repeatedly across multiple materials, and names, quantities, and dates need to be aligned item by item. When entering this function, the physical examination form assumes the role of baseline record, the re-examination application assumes the role of change trigger, and the restricted-major notification assumes the role of result confirmation; together the three support verification of the progress table and the statistical scope statement.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool call node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). The "progress table and statistical scope statement" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The model judges whether to call based on the tool description, parameter description, and whether parameters are required; toolChoice and functionCall determine single or parallel call mode.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the same candidate's names, quantities, and dates match across two materials | Open the physical examination forms one by one and verify name, candidate number, physical examination date, chief examiner's conclusion, and signature; cross-compare with the re-examination application and restricted-major notification, and mark those missing signatures or receipts as pending supplementation |
| Re-examination application | Whether the re-examination items, application date, original conclusion, and acceptance receipt are consistent with the physical examination form | Use one week of records to verify the totals, and check whether the original conclusion in the re-examination application and the conclusion in the physical examination form come from the same source; for versions not yet synchronized, take the latest acceptance receipt as authoritative, and state the scope and exceptions in the table header |
| Restricted-major notification | Whether the restricted major name, notification date, and candidate acknowledgment align with the statistical scope statement | Verify whether the restricted major name in the notification is consistent with the admissions catalog; list those missing acknowledgment separately, and confirm whether the inputs and returns contain this field |
| Tool call node | Whether the tool description, parameter description, and whether required correspond to the material fields | On the canvas, verify the diamond-shaped interface connections and node status, and test-run with a question missing a required parameter to confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name or candidate number is written differently in the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: the two materials are entered in different steps, and no unified primary key mapping has been made.
- Symptom: the statistical totals do not match the number of records in the progress table. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and after the re-examination application is updated, the baseline record of the physical examination form is not written back.
- Symptom: the restricted-major notification is missing the candidate's acknowledgment or receipt. Cause: notification issuance and acknowledgment belong to two different nodes, and the receipt is not collected together with the materials.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test-run with a question missing a required parameter, check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, verify the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the call record.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated; for the referenced content budget, verify the tokens of the referenced text according to quoteMaxToken, and record the number of array items separately.
- Open each tool node's description field and parameter configuration one by one, verify the three items of description, parameter description, and whether required, and confirm they correspond to the fields of the physical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification.
- On the canvas, verify the diamond-shaped interface connections and node status, and test-run with a question missing a required field to observe whether it asks a follow-up question first rather than directly fabricating a value.