What this category's data looks like
The organization of college admissions physical examinations involves three types of materials: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted major notifications. Physical examination forms record height, weight, vision and color perception, internal medicine and surgery, past medical history, and the chief examiner's conclusion item by item for each candidate, including the examination date, physician's signature, and candidate confirmation; re-examination applications record the original item, re-examination date, conclusion, and approval signature; restricted major notifications record the name of the restricted major, the basis clause, notification date, and the receipt from the candidate or parent. Materials are summarized by batch and by high school, updated once a week, with fields mainly consisting of name, candidate number, item, date, and signature. After entering the knowledge base retrieval service, the three types of materials each serve as candidate fragment sources, respectively taking on the recall roles of conclusions, re-examinations, and notifications, and the retrieval results are used by subsequent nodes or manual work to generate progress tables and statistical scope explanations.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The "progress table and statistical scope explanation" is completed by subsequent nodes or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields include name, candidate number, item, examination date, physician's signature, and candidate confirmation; no items may be missing | In the search test, use synonymous questions to retrieve, check the number of candidates and scores, and verify whether dates and signatures are returned with the fragments |
| Re-examination application | Fields include original item, re-examination date, re-examination conclusion, and approval signature; must be consistent with the physical examination form in item name, quantity, and date | Switch searchMode to hybrid, see whether candidates include both semantic and full-text results, then compare the same record in the re-examination and physical examination form |
| Restricted major notification | Fields include restricted major name, basis clause, notification date, and receipt; the receipt must not be missing | Enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few items, and verify whether the notification date and receipt fragments are retained |
| Progress table and statistical scope explanation | Record counts and statistical counts match, the scope is written in the header, and exceptional cases are listed separately | Use one week's records to check the totals, check whether candidates after similarity filtering cover all records, and whether the cited text is complete after limit trimming |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate's item names, quantities, and dates in the physical examination form and re-examination application do not match. Cause: The two records are entered separately and not checked against the same scope, and retrieval candidates return fragments separately.
- Phenomenon: The version of the restricted major notification is not synchronized, and old clauses and new clauses appear together in candidates. Cause: After materials are updated, they are not uniformly replaced, and retrieval recalls old fragments by similarity.
- Phenomenon: The re-examination application lacks an approval signature, or the restricted major notification lacks a receipt. Cause: Materials were not fully collected during the circulation process, candidate fragments only cover existing fields, and omissions are easy to miss during verification.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle reranking to see the ranking of the top few items; check the effects of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit.
Business test: use one week's records to check the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, compare the number of candidates and scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and record the differences. - Enable and disable
usingReRank, compare the ranking of the top few items; adjustsimilarityandlimit, and record the cited text tokens and array item counts separately.