What this category's data looks like
The materials of a university admissions medical examination organization mainly consist of medical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. They come from the school hospital or a designated medical examination institution, and their update cadence advances according to admissions batches and re-examination rounds. A medical examination form contains name, sex, past history, conclusions for each department, chief examiner's opinion, date, and signature; a re-examination application contains the reason for application, original conclusion, re-examination items, date, and receipt; a restricted-major notification contains the major name, basis for restriction, notification date, and candidate or parent acknowledgment. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the medical examination form serves as the first-round factual draft, the re-examination application serves as the basis for follow-up questions, and the restricted-major notification serves as the constraint source for external replies. Authorized access and external services are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; the dialogue feature only provides the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints for the model to answer accordingly.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Medical examination form | Names, quantities, dates, and signatures are consistent item by item with the re-examination application and restricted-major notification | Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check whether the second turn inherits the references from the first turn; inspect the correspondence between messages and chatId |
| Re-examination application | The reason for application, original conclusion, re-examination items, date, and receipt are complete and match the medical examination form | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns; check whether the fields brought in variables are consistent with the materials |
| Restricted-major notification | The major name, basis for restriction, notification date, and acknowledgment record match the conclusion of the medical examination form | Access once with a restricted identity to see whether the visible scope matches the setting; check whether the opening message is treated as prior context |
| External entry points and authorization scope | Visitor identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized access is not visible | Use the publishing service and file permissions to check the entry scope; on the dialogue side, only check whether the answer constraints cover the restricted-major notification |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the medical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, lacking cross-material consistency checking.
- Symptom: The version of the restricted-major notification is not synchronized, and the old basis is still referenced. Cause: After the notification is updated, it is not reviewed together with the conclusion of the medical examination form.
- Symptom: The re-examination application lacks a signature or receipt, but the external reply still treats it as accepted. Cause: Material completeness is not checked before entering the dialogue.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the references from the first question; check messages and chatId to confirm that the fields brought in by variables are consistent with the materials.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity to see whether the visible scope matches the setting.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and compare the usage records of the two runs.
- Check item by item the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the medical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification, and inspect the correspondence between
messagesandchatId.