What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the kindergarten operation behavior and quality self-assessment scenario. Material sources include self-assessment reports, issue lists, rectification plans, as well as external specifications, evaluation indicators, and bilingual reference drafts. The update cadence rolls with semesters and assessment cycles, and field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, receipts, and version numbers. When entering this feature, the self-assessment reports and issue lists serve as the parsable text body, the rectification plans serve as the clause-and-deadline comparison, the bilingual reference drafts serve the verification role of terminology referring back to the source text, and the evaluation indicators serve as the terminology glossary anchor. Multilingual materials and terminology handling require the same term to be consistent throughout the entire text and the translated name to be able to refer back to the source text. Document parsing and chunking need to preserve field boundaries and the positions of dates and signatures, to facilitate subsequent retrieval and reference draft generation.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the parsing and training task (server-side task), outputting data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). "Unified terminology glossary and reference draft" is then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessment report | Names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts are consistent within the report and correspond item by item with the issue list | Open the data row to check the chunkSize and chunkSplitter results, and sample three terms to check their spelling throughout the entire text |
| Issue list | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record match between the list and the rectification plan, and version numbers are in sync | Check the file records and data rows separately, and confirm that trainingType and the three states are consistent |
| Rectification plan | The deadlines, responsible persons, and receipts of the rectification clauses are complete, and items missing signatures can be located to specific chunks | View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that only data with completed indexing is covered |
| Bilingual reference draft | The same term is consistent throughout the entire text, the translated name can refer back to the source text, and the terminology glossary and the reference draft refer to each other | Sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, and check the source-text reference positions |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the self-assessment report and the issue list. Cause: Parsing and chunking did not preserve field boundaries, and after the two materials were chunked separately, they lacked a comparison anchor.
- Symptom: The rectification plan version is not in sync, and old-version clauses are still hit by retrieval. Cause: Data pending indexing is not isolated from data with completed indexing, and the rebuild scope is not limited by index status.
- Symptom: The self-assessment report is missing signatures or receipts, yet the published draft still shows as complete. Cause: Signature and receipt fields were not included in chunk verification; successful parsing does not equal a guaranteed retrieval hit.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: Upload one material and observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task. The status should be one of the three states parsed / indexing / indexed and consistent with the interface display; changing models only rebuilds data with completed indexing.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, confirm that the translated names can refer back to the source text, and check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the three materials: the self-assessment report, the issue list, and the rectification plan.
- Open the data row to check the status, check the file records and data rows separately, and confirm that the unique data identifier is bound correctly.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, confirm that only data with completed indexing is covered, and sample three terms to check their spelling throughout the entire text.