What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: Social assessment of occupational skill level certification involves materials such as assessment implementation plans, candidate registration forms, and assessor dispatch forms, with fields covering candidate name, occupation/trade, level, date, and signature column. The materials are submitted by assessment institutions and assessors, and the update rhythm rolls with each batch. During multilingual materials and terminology handling, the assessment implementation plan provides terminology definitions and the assessment framework, the candidate registration form provides multilingual renderings of fields such as name, trade, and level, and the assessor dispatch form provides dispatch date, assessor name, and signature receipt information. After these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, they respectively take on the roles of terminology source, field comparison, and record verification, and are used to generate a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This part is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by the model, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment implementation plan | The same terminology is consistent throughout the entire document, and the translated name can refer back to the original text; the occupation/trade, level, and date fields are written consistently in the two materials | In the application settings, check the value of the memory turn count, use chatId to locate the same session, and check whether the terminology wording in messages refers back to the original text of the plan |
| Candidate registration form | The candidate name, occupation/trade, level, date, and signature column match in name, quantity, and date between the registration form and the dispatch form | Run a trial with two consecutive question turns: in the first turn, ask about the registration form fields; in the second turn, use a referential follow-up to ask about the corresponding items in the dispatch form, and check whether the fields in variables are consistent |
| Assessor dispatch form | The dispatch date, assessor name, signature, and receipt are complete, and the version is synchronized with the assessment implementation plan | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the usage changes after adjusting the turn count, and check whether the signature column and receipt of the dispatch form have missing items |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name is written differently in the registration form and the dispatch form, and the quantity and date do not match. Cause: The multilingual materials did not unify terminology, and the two materials were entered separately.
- Phenomenon: After the assessment implementation plan is updated, the registration form and dispatch form still use the old version's date and trade name. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and there was no unified terminology glossary constraint.
- Phenomenon: The dispatch form lacks the assessor's signature or receipt, and the record cannot be verified. Cause: The signature column and receipt fields were not included in the comparison draft check.
How to verify the setup
How to verify the setup: Acceptance for this feature: two consecutive follow-up turns. In the first turn, ask how a certain term is written in the assessment implementation plan; in the second turn, use a referential follow-up to ask about its corresponding item in the registration form, and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the entire document, and verify whether the translated names can refer back to the original text.
- In the application settings, check the current value of the memory turn count and match it with the preceding context range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive question turns to confirm that the second turn can correctly carry forward the reference from the first turn.