What this category's data looks like
This page addresses examination organization and violation processing scenarios. Materials include three types: examination manuals, examination room records, and violation fact records. Examination manuals provide process and terminology baselines; examination room records carry on-site time, personnel, and signatures; violation fact records carry fact descriptions and receipts. Field characteristics center on examination room number, subject, date, violation clause, quantity, signature, and receipt. When materials enter the model access and configuration function, examination manuals serve as terminology sources for comparison, while examination room records and violation fact records serve as materials to be verified for extraction and comparison. The update rhythm advances with examination batches and processing stages, and versions must be synchronized with batches.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology table and comparison draft are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Configuration only determines which type of model is called and whether the channel is available; it does not change the fields or permissions of the materials themselves.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Examination manual | Terminology baseline and process fields must correspond item by item with examination room records and violation fact records; terminology wording must be consistent throughout and traceable back to the original text | In the model configuration, verify the type annotations of the language model and index model, compare against the model name returned by the channel, and spot-check terminology wording in the two types of materials |
| Examination room record | Examination room number, subject, date, violation clause, quantity, and signature must be consistent with the violation fact record, and receipts must be complete | Verify the channel configuration and key source, confirm the index model is bound to the retrieval step, and compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials |
| Violation fact record | Fact description, clause, date, and signature must align with the examination manual and examination room record, and the version must be synchronized with the batch | In dialogue and retrieval, verify the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken and the tokens of the quoted text; record the number of array items separately |
| Model type | Five types: language, index, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, corresponding to the steps in which they are used | In the model configuration, verify the type annotations, and confirm that the retrieval step is bound to the index model and the dialogue step is bound to the language model |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same examination room number is written differently in the examination room record and the violation fact record. Cause: Terminology is not unified, the two materials are entered separately, and there is no comparison draft tracing back to the original text.
- Symptom: Violation quantity and date do not match between the two materials. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, old drafts are not replaced after the processing stage advances, and fields are not compared item by item.
- Symptom: The examination room record lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The on-site process is not closed-loop, and completeness checks for signatures and receipts are not performed before materials enter configuration.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, verify that the model identifier in the response matches the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the binding relationship falls on the corresponding step.
Business test: select three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and verify that the terms can be traced back to the original text.
- Verify the channel configuration and key source, and confirm they are consistent with the connected service.
- Compare against the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation.