What this category's data looks like
This page addresses multilingual materials and terminology processing in adult college entrance examination registration and admission management. Material sources include registration forms exported from provincial registration systems, care bonus materials submitted by candidates, admission rosters compiled by institutions, and accompanying terminology comparison drafts. The update cadence advances with registration batches, bonus review, and admission stages, and fields involve name, ID number, date of birth, care item, bonus score, admitted major, signature, and receipt. Registration forms provide candidates' basic fields and preference information; care bonus materials provide certificate number, issue date, and review opinion; admission rosters provide admission conclusion, roster serial number, and signature field. When these three types of materials enter this feature, they each assume the roles of field source, supporting evidence, and conclusion record, for use by the subsequent unified terminology table and comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
The server-side model channel configuration only outputs model binding relationships and channel responses; the unified terminology table and comparison draft must be done by the dialogue and retrieval components. Models are divided into five types: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and during configuration the type labels and the model names returned by the channel must be checked.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Fields, dates, and signatures must correspond consistently with the care bonus materials and admission roster | Check name, ID number, date of birth, and preference fields, compare the dates and signature fields across the three materials, and confirm there are no missing items |
| Care bonus materials | Care item, bonus score, certificate number, and issue date must be traceable back to the source text | Check the certificate number and issue date, confirm that the bonus item name is written consistently with the registration form and admission roster, and inspect the review signature and receipt |
| Admission roster | Admitted major, roster serial number, and signature must match the registration form and care bonus materials | Check the roster serial number and admission conclusion, compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record across the three materials, and confirm version synchronization |
| Model configuration | Model type corresponds to the stage to be used, and the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | In the model configuration, check the type labels, compare against the model names returned by the channel, and inspect the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name spelling or date of birth of the same candidate does not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The two materials were entered at different times, and terminology comparison and version synchronization were not performed.
- Symptom: The care bonus materials lack a review signature or receipt, yet the admission roster has already included the bonus. Cause: The material circulation stage did not verify the signature and receipt, and versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error, or the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The model type does not match the stage binding, or the model name returned by the channel is inconsistent with the configuration.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm it is consistent with the model name returned by the channel.
Business testing: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm that the translated names can be traced back to the source text.
- In the model configuration, check item by item the correspondence between the model type labels and the stages to which they are connected, and compare against the model names returned by the channel.
- Before releasing the unified terminology table and comparison draft externally, sample three terms and check their spelling throughout the entire text, confirming that the same term is consistent throughout and that the translated names can be traced back to the source text.