What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the academic journal business cooperation management scenario, with materials including business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Agreements provide cooperation entity, term, and settlement fields; review forms provide advertising content, review date, and signature fields; distribution materials provide distribution scope, quantity, and receipt records. Multilingual materials and terminology processing require that the same term be written consistently throughout and that translated names can refer back to the original text, while citation sources and traceability require that each citation can be traced back to the original paragraph. The material update cadence changes with the cooperation cycle and version iterations, and common field characteristics are that names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts are scattered across different materials. When the three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval, they each assume the roles of clause basis, review evidence, and distribution evidence, for use in subsequent comparison and ledger generation.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of citation content, each containing an original text snippet and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Citation content is output as an array, and the length can be 0; even if no content is retrieved, the output chain will still run through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Check the cooperation entity name, agreement term, settlement quantity, and signature field, and confirm whether the same record name, quantity, and date match those in the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials | Open the citation superscript in the conversation, compare it against the original agreement paragraph, record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget, and check the source identifiers in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList |
| Advertising review form | Check the advertising content, review date, and signature or receipt fields, and confirm that the version is synchronized with the distribution cooperation materials; a missing signature or receipt means inconsistency | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the citation array is empty while the chain continues; then, for a question that hits, check whether the citation snippets can refer back to the original text of the review form |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Check the distribution scope, quantity, date, and receipt records, and confirm consistency with the business cooperation agreement and advertising review form in name, quantity, and date | Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item; in the node, check whether the selected knowledge bases and their vector models use the same vector model |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | Sample three terms to check whether the writing is consistent throughout, whether the translated names can refer back to the original text, and whether the citation sources are traceable | Compare against the source documents and check the citation superscripts item by item, record the citation array length, separately record the quoteMaxToken budget, and do not perform an equality comparison |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the business cooperation agreement and the distribution cooperation materials. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, the fields are not aligned according to the same terminology glossary, and the citation sources do not refer back to the original text item by item.
- Phenomenon: The version of the advertising review form is not synchronized, and the signature or receipt is missing. Cause: The material update cadences differ, the old version is still hit in the knowledge base, and the citation snippets are inconsistent with the current original text.
- Phenomenon: There is no citation superscript in the answer, or the citation snippets do not match the original text. Cause: First check whether this round hit and which material was hit, then look at trimming; an empty citation array does not equal retrieval failure.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask a question with original-text support, and check whether the citation array and superscripts can refer back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether the writing is consistent throughout, whether the translated names can refer back to the original text, and whether the citation sources and traceability can be checked.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge bases and their vector models, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- In the conversation, open the citation superscripts and check the citation snippets against the source documents; record the number of citations and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget, and checkquoteListwithinresponseData.