What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the deployment, operations, and application handover scenario for kindergarten game activity organization. The material sources are class observation records, area activity plans, material placement lists, activity objective tables, and reflection-to-next-week plan tables. The update cadence advances weekly: the area plan comes first, observation records are generated along with activities, the material list is checked before activities, objective achievement is backfilled after activities, and the reflection-to-next-week plan is summarized on weekends. After entering workflow orchestration, the correspondence between observation records and area plans serves as the basis for branch judgment, the material placement quantity serves as a check item on the handover form, activity objective achievement serves as the precondition for subsequent nodes to continue execution, and the reflection-to-next-week plan serves as the entry point for continuation by the next shift. The four types of materials each play different roles: the plan sets direction, the records verify the process, the list controls quantity, and the reflection connects to next week.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "handover-ready deployment state and operation records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Correspondence between observation records and area plans | Determine whether observation records are attached one by one to the activity entries in the current week's area plan, and whether unattached entries are left blank on the handover form | In the user selection node, check the options and branch connections one by one to confirm that each record has a corresponding plan entry |
| Material placement quantity | Determine whether the quantity in the material placement list matches the quantity required for that activity in the area plan, and whether missing items are marked on the handover form | In a subsequent node, reference the selection result variable variables and run a trial once to check that the quantity matches the plan |
| Activity objective achievement | Determine whether the behavior descriptions in the observation records point to the current week's activity objectives, and whether entries where objectives and observations do not match are listed separately | Trigger the user selection node once and check the node status and nodeId in the run records to verify the correspondence between objectives and observations |
| Reflection-to-next-week plan | Determine whether reflection entries have been transferred into next week's plan, and whether entries whose plans have not been updated are marked as to-do on the handover form | Check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and confirm that reflection entries have entered next week's plan |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The material quantity on the handover form does not match the area plan. Cause: The material placement list was not updated along with the plan, items were not checked one by one against the list before the activity, and missing items were not marked on the handover form.
- Symptom: The behaviors described in the observation records do not match the current week's activity objectives. Cause: The objective table was not adjusted along with the activity, observation records were not attached according to objective entries, and objectives and observations became disconnected.
- Symptom: Reflection entries remain in the current week, and next week's plan has not been updated. Cause: The reflection-to-next-week plan did not enter the workflow branch, and the plan update status was not checked against the handover form during handover.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch directions and interaction states in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable variables has been passed to subsequent nodes, and that the node nodeId status is recorded.
Business testing: check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and after confirming that the version, connection, and task records are consistent, hand over to operations or the next shift.
- In the user selection node, check the options and branch connections one by one, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and trigger it once to view the node status in the run records.
- In a subsequent node, reference the selection result variable
variablesand run a trial once, check the branch directions and interaction state records, then check materials, objectives, and plan updates item by item according to the handover form.