What the documents look like
Central chain procurement and distribution data centers on head-office purchasing and delivery. The main sources are ERP purchasing, WMS, store POS, and supplier delivery data. Day-to-day documents include centralized procurement contracts, replenishment plans, delivery notes, and store requisition orders. Update frequency is daily or weekly.
These documents carry different roles in order fulfillment and after-sales question handling. A centralized procurement contract defines the purchasing entity and the supply scope. A replenishment plan and a store requisition order reflect the result of demand aggregation. A delivery note records the actual dispatch target. Workflow routing has to pass fields and statuses from these documents between nodes, and separate actions that are existing node behavior from actions that require a separate business interface.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
The form input node is a user-interaction node. When it triggers, the conversation enters an interaction state, the workflow state is recorded, and after the user fills in required information and submits, the node collects the submitted form information and passes it to later nodes. The user selection node is also a user-interaction node. When it triggers, the conversation enters an interaction state, the workflow state is recorded, and after the user makes a choice, the node evaluates that choice and executes the corresponding "yes" branch. The interaction state record is behavior of the interaction nodes. No separate global state-recording switch is documented. Collected information must be explicitly passed to later retrieval, judgment, or interface nodes, and output must be compared item by item against input. Order writing, document backfill, and external status synchronization require a separate business interface or a later process. Retrieval and forms do not themselves constitute authorized execution.
Hypothetical drill sample: a chain supply-chain center receives a store requisition order, number YHD-2026-0312, object is a distribution center, status is "pending aggregation," effective range is March 12 to March 15. Centralized procurement contract HT-2026-018 states the supplier is Supplier A, the purchaser is the head-office supply-chain center, and the contract period is the full year 2026. One draft sentence to be judged is: "YHD-2026-0312 has been confirmed for delivery by Supplier A." No supplier confirmation record is provided for this sentence, so it remains unsupported.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Existing node behavior | After triggering, enters interaction state, collects required information, and passes it to later nodes |
| User selection node | Existing node behavior | After the user makes a choice, executes the corresponding "yes" branch; verify branch connections one by one |
| Interaction state check | Manual verification action | Confirm the interaction node records state; no separate global state-recording switch is documented |
| Output handoff check | Implementation check item | Explicitly pass collected information to later retrieval, judgment, or interface nodes |
| External action division | Requires separate system implementation | Order writing, document backfill, and external status synchronization require a separate business interface |
| Hypothetical trial starting point | Hypothetical value for this page | Order number YHD-2026-0312 as a pending-aggregation sample, compared against actual dispatch records in delivery notes |
Three common errors
- Treating information collected by the form input node as already authorized execution. Input is the "pending aggregation" status of store requisition order YHD-2026-0312; the comparison object is the supply scope in centralized procurement contract HT-2026-018; the observable result is that the node output only passes fields and produces no order writing or supplier confirmation.
- Treating the "yes" branch of the user selection node as completed business approval. Input is the draft sentence "YHD-2026-0312 has been confirmed for delivery by Supplier A"; the comparison object is whether a corresponding confirmation record exists in supplier delivery data; the observable result is that when no confirmation record exists, the sentence remains unsupported.
- Treating retrieval results as a basis for permission or entity isolation. Input is documents related to YHD-2026-0312 in the retrieval library; the comparison object is whether the authorization scope covers that store and distribution center; the observable result is that semantic recall does not perform permission filtering, and the authorization boundary must be checked separately.
How to verify the setup
- Input the "pending aggregation" status of store requisition order YHD-2026-0312 from the hypothetical sample and the supply scope of centralized procurement contract HT-2026-018. Compare whether the form input node output fields match the input. The observable result is that fields are passed completely and no order-writing action appears; this is treated as satisfying the condition.
- Input the draft sentence "YHD-2026-0312 has been confirmed for delivery by Supplier A." Compare whether a corresponding confirmation record exists in supplier delivery data. The observable result is that when no confirmation record exists, the sentence is judged unsupported; this is treated as satisfying the condition.
- Input documents related to YHD-2026-0312 in the retrieval library. Compare whether the authorization scope covers that store and distribution center. The observable result is that retrieval results do not change authorization status, and the authorization boundary requires manual verification; this is treated as satisfying the condition.