What the documents look like
For staff training in On-demand retail fulfillment, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Trace substitution conditions, role replies and picking records by exercise version. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed immediate-retail lesson requires asking the customer before substitution, gives a role reply accepting fragrance-free products only and contains a learner handling draft selecting the same brand’s scented item. A picking checkmark belongs to the preceding exercise. The question asks whether the current exercise was completed as instructed. The condition excludes the chosen scent, and the earlier checkmark records no current action. Preserve the word only and exercise identity instead of summarizing away a product attribute through shared branding or treating a written handling draft as executed substitution.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Training-source check | Teaching identity and evidence scope | Acceptance action |
|---|---|---|
| Customer limitation | Fragrance-free only | Retain full condition. |
| Draft choice | Scented differs from fragrance-free | Compare attributes. |
| Earlier checkmark | Previous exercise | Do not transfer to current question. |
| Execution identity | Draft is learning output | Do not make it business action. |
| Added test | Question and fragrance match | Retain hypothetical label. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, a summary may omit the fragrance-free condition; trace the full role reply and current substitute rather than citing the brand alone. Second, a preceding checkmark may become execution for this question; compare exercise number, product and record identity instead of connecting through the same operation name. Third, the learner draft may become completed real substitution; distinguish learning output from operation evidence, which is absent here. These concern condition retention, record attribution and execution support. Finishing a text cannot establish a completed transaction merely because it describes the intended action.
How to verify the setup
Ask what the role accepts, what the draft selects and whether a matching current execution record exists, inspecting actual references. Draft-only results require investigation of the condition card and role reply; failure to return them establishes no absence of restrictions. Added practice records must match question and fragrance and remain explicitly test material. Empty references require scope and transfer investigation. This page executes no substitution, refund or delivery and evaluates no real satisfaction effect. Whether the learner adopted the condition still needs direct comparison with the original wording.