What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the category of student disciplinary action and appeal handling. Materials include three types: disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal statements. Sources are daily records, deliberation conclusions, and submissions by appellants. The update cadence advances with handling milestones. Field characteristics center on party information, descriptions of disciplinary facts, cited provisions, types of disciplinary action, dates and signatures, and receipts. When entering the material drafting and responsibility handover function, disciplinary fact materials provide the factual draft and evidence list, disciplinary decision documents carry the deliberation conclusions and service requirements, and appeal statements present appeal requests and grounds; all three share the same set of party name, quantity, and date fields, making it easy to align item by item during drafting and handover and avoid the same record appearing inconsistently across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Material drafts and handover records that can be issued" are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the party name, quantity, date, and signature fields; in application settings, view the maxResponse slider position and the maxContext range |
| Disciplinary decision documents | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the type of disciplinary action, cited provisions, service receipt, and signature fields; confirm that quoteMaxToken matches the tokens of the quoted text |
| Appeal statements | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the appeal request, grounds, date, and signature; compare names and quantities item by item against the fact materials |
| Handover records | Responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the transferor, transferee, transfer date, and receipt; confirm consistency with the decision document version number |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same party's name is written differently in the fact materials and the decision document. Cause: The field source was not unified during drafting, and no item-by-item comparison was made before handover.
- Phenomenon: The version number and date of the disciplinary decision document and the handover record are inconsistent. Cause: They were not updated synchronously after modification, and the version and date were not checked during handover.
- Phenomenon: The appeal statement lacks a signature or the service receipt is missing. Cause: The template did not set required-field validation, and the handover step did not block missing items.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance check: submit a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and confirm that the response limit matches the answer length required by the page.
Business test: draft one document according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and compare usage changes between two runs.
- Submit a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; check whether the answer breaks off mid-sentence or is clearly longer than needed.